Jerry's profileSZhang摘抄BlogLists Tools Help
7/31/2006

量子自杀试验

       令人毛骨悚然和啼笑皆非的“量子自杀”实验在80年代末由Hans Moravec,Bruno Marchal等人提出,而又在1998年为宇宙学家Max Tegmark在那篇广为人知的宣传MWI的论文中所发展和重提。这实际上也是薛定谔猫的一个真人版。大家知道在猫实验里,如果原子衰变,猫就被毒死,反之则存活。对此,哥本哈根派的解释是:在我们没有观测它之前,猫是“又死又活”的,而观测后猫的波函数发生坍缩,猫要么死要么活。MWI则声称:每次实验必定同时产生一只活猫和一只死猫,只不过它们存在于两个平行的世界中。
  两者有何实质不同呢?其关键就在于,哥本哈根派认为猫始终只有一只,它开始处在叠加态,坍缩后有50%的可能死,50%的可能活。而多宇宙认为猫并未叠加,而是“分裂”成了两只,一死一活,必定有一只活猫!
  现在假如有一位勇于为科学献身的仁人义士,他自告奋勇地去代替那只倒霉的猫。出于人道主义,为了让他少受痛苦,我们把毒气瓶改为一把枪。如果原子衰变(或者利用别的量子机制,比如光子通过了半镀银),则枪就“砰”地一响送我们这位朋友上路。反之,枪就只发出“咔”地一声空响。
  现在关键问题来了,当一个光子到达半镀镜的时候,根据哥本哈根派,你有一半可能听到“咔”一声然后安然无恙,另一半就不太美妙,你听到“砰”一声然后什么都不知道了。而根据多宇宙,必定有一个你听到“咔”,另一个你在另一个世界里听到“砰”。但问题是,听到“砰”的那位随即就死掉了,什么感觉都没有了,这个世界对“你”来说就已经没有意义了。对你来说,唯一有意义的世界就是你活着的那个世界。
  所以,从人择原理的角度上来讲,对你唯一有意义的“存在”就是那些你活着的世界。你永远只会听到“咔”而继续活着!因为多宇宙和哥本哈根不同,永远都会有一个你活在某个世界!
  让我们每隔一秒钟发射一个光子到半镀镜来触动机关。此时哥本哈根预言,就算你运气非常之好,你也最多听到好几声“咔”然后最终死掉。但多宇宙的预言是:永远都会有一个“你”活着,而他的那个世界对“你”来说是唯一有意义的存在。只要你坐在枪口面前,那么从你本人的角度来看,你永远只会听到每隔一秒响一次的“咔”声,你永远不死(虽然在别的数目惊人的世界中,你已经尸横遍野,但那些世界对你没有意义)!
  但只要你从枪口移开,你就又会听到“砰”声了,因为这些世界重新对你恢复了意义,你能够活着见证它们。总而言之,多宇宙的预言是:只要你在枪口前,(对你来说)它就绝对不会发射,一旦你移开,它就又开始随机地“砰”。
  所以,对这位测试者他自己来说,假如他一直听到“咔”而好端端地活着,他就可以在很大程度上确信,多宇宙解释是正确的。假如他死掉了,那么哥本哈根解释就是正确的。不过这对他来说也已经没有意义了,人都死掉了。
  各位也许对这里的人择原理大感困惑。无论如何,枪一直“咔”是一个极小极小的概率不是吗(如果n次,则概率就是1/2^n)?怎么能说对你而言枪“必定”会这样行动呢?但问题在于,“对你而言”的前提是,“你”必须存在!
  让我们这样来举例:假如你是男性,你必定会发现这样一个“有趣”的事实:你爸爸有儿子、你爷爷有儿子、你曾祖父有儿子……一直上溯到任意n代祖先,不管历史上冰川严寒、洪水猛兽、兵荒马乱、饥饿贫瘠,他们不但都能存活,而且子嗣不断,始终有儿子,这可是一个非常小的概率(如果你是女性,可以往娘家那条路上推)。但假如你因此感慨说,你的存在是一个百年不遇的“奇迹”,就非常可笑了。很明显,你能够感慨的前提条件是你的存在本身!事实上,如果“客观”地讲,一个家族n代都有儿子的概率极小,但对你我来说,却是“必须”的,概率为100%的!同理,有人感慨宇宙的精巧,其产生的概率是如此低,但按照人择原理,宇宙必须如此!在量子自杀中,只要你始终存在,那么对你来说枪就必须100%地不发射!
  但很可惜的是:就算你发现了多宇宙解释是正确的,这也只是对你自己一个人而言的知识。就我们这些旁观者而言事实永远都是一样的:你在若干次“咔”后被一枪打死。我们能够做的,也就是围绕在你的尸体旁边争论,到底是按照哥本哈根,你已经永远地从宇宙中消失了,还是按照MWI,你仍然在某个世界中活得逍遥自在。我们这些“外人”被投影到你活着的那个世界,这个概率极低,几乎可以不被考虑,但对你“本人”来说,你存在于那个世界却是100%必须的!而且,因为各个世界之间无法互相干涉,所以你永远也不能从那个世界来到我们这里,告诉我们多宇宙论是正确的!
  其实,Tegmark等人根本不必去费心设计什么“量子自杀”实验,按照他们的思路,是多宇宙解释是正确的,那么对于某人来说,他无论如何试图去自杀都不会死!要是他拿刀抹脖子,那么因为组成刀的是一群符合薛定谔波动方程的粒子,所以总有一个非常非常小,但确实不为0的可能性,这些粒子在那一刹那都发生了量子隧道效应,以某种方式丝毫无损地穿透了该人的脖子,从而保持该人不死!当然这个概率极小极小,但按照MWI,一切可能发生的都实际发生了,所以这个现象总会发生在某个世界!在“客观”上讲,此人在99.99999…99%的世界中都命丧黄泉,但从他的“主观视角”来说,他却一直活着!不管换什么方式都一样,跳楼也好,卧轨也好,上吊也好,总存在那么一些世界,让他还活着。从该人自身的视角来看,他怎么死都死不掉!
  这就是从量子自杀思想实验推出的怪论,美其名曰“量子永生”(quantum immortality)。只要从主观视角来看,不但一个人永远无法完成自杀,事实上他一旦开始存在,就永远不会消失!总存在着一些量子效应,使得一个人不会衰老,而按照MWI,这些非常低的概率总是对应于某个实际的世界!如果多宇宙理论是正确的,那么我们得到的推论是:一旦一个“意识”开始存在,从它自身的角度来看,它就必定永生!(天哪,我们怎么又扯到了“意识”!)
  这是最强版本的人择原理,也称为“最终人择原理”。
  可以想象,Tegmark等多宇宙论的支持者见到自己的提议被演绎成了这么一个奇谈怪论后,是怎样的一种哭笑不得的心态。这位宾夕法尼亚大学的宇宙学家不得不出来声明,说“永生”并非MWI的正统推论。他说一个人在“死前”,还经历了某种非量子化的过程,使得所谓的意识并不能连续过渡保持永存。可惜也不太有人相信他的辩护。
  关于这个问题,科学家们和哲学家们无疑都会感到兴趣。支持MWI的人也会批评说,大量宇宙样本中的“人”的死去不能被简单地忽略,因为对于“意识”我们还是几乎一无所知的,它是如何“连续存在”的,根本就没有经过考察。一些偏颇的意见会认为,假如说“意识”必定会在某些宇宙分支中连续地存在,那么我们应该断定它不但始终存在,而且永远“连续”,也就是说,我们不该有“失去意识”的时候(例如睡觉或者昏迷)。不过,也许的确存在一些世界,在那里我们永不睡觉,谁又知道呢?再说,暂时沉睡然后又苏醒,这对于“意识”来说好像不能算作“无意义”的。而更为重要的,也许还是如何定义在多世界中的“你”究竟是个什么东西的问题。总之,这里面逻辑怪圈层出不穷,而且几乎没有什么可以为实践所检验的东西,都是空对空。我想,波普尔对此不会感到满意的!

  关于自杀实验本身,我想也不太有人会仅仅为了检验哥本哈根和MWI而实际上真的去尝试!因为不管怎么样,实验的结果也只有你自己一个人知道而已,你无法把它告诉广大人民群众。而且要是哥本哈根解释不幸地是正确的,那你也就呜乎哀哉了。虽说“朝闻道,夕死可矣”,但一般来说,闻了道,最好还是利用它做些什么来得更有意义。而且,就算你在枪口前真的不死,你也无法确实地判定,这是因为多世界预言的结果,还是只不过仅仅因为你的运气非常非常非常好。你最多能说:“我有99.999999..99%的把握宣称,多世界是正确的。”如此而已。
  根据Shikhovtsev最新的传记,埃弗莱特本人也在某种程度上相信他的“意识”会沿着某些不通向死亡的宇宙分支而一直延续下去(当然他不知道自杀实验)。但具有悲剧和讽刺意味的是,他一家子都那么相信平行宇宙,以致他的女儿丽兹(Liz)在自杀前留下的遗书中说,她去往“另一个平行世界”和他相会了(当然,她并非为了检验这个理论而自杀)。或许埃弗莱特一家真的在某个世界里相会也未可知,但至少在我们现在所在的这个世界(以及绝大多数其他世界)里,我们看到人死不能复生了。所以,至少考虑在绝大多数世界中家人和朋友们的感情,我强烈建议各位读者不要在科学热情的驱使下做此尝试。

薛定谔的猫

    一切都起因于爱因斯坦提出的光子说。

  把光看成是一种粒子(即“光子”),可惹出了大麻烦!如果我们承认光是一种粒子,那么我们如何来解释光的衍射?要知道,光的衍射效应可是区别“光是粒子还是波”的一个关键性实验呀!但后来的实验的的确确证明了:光既是一种波,又同时是一种粒子。这个图像真是太离奇了。薛定谔的猫以及其他许多佯谬,都起源于这一矛盾而离奇的图像。为了解决这一矛盾离奇的图像,哥本哈根学派的物理学家提出了一种解释(即“几率波”的解释):我们说光是一种波动,是指光是一种“几率波”;是指在衍射图像上光子(或者电子、原子等等)出现的几率:在衍射明条纹上发现粒子的几率大,在衍射暗条纹上发现粒子的几率小。显然,这一解释表明自然法则中存在着一种根本的随机性。爱因斯坦对这一解释很是不满,并且说了一句很有名的话:“我不相信上帝会玩掷骰子。”后来爱因斯坦还提出一个“EPR佯谬”来反驳哥本哈根的解释。但是,现在实验已经证明爱因斯坦的这一反驳失败了。

  与爱因斯坦提出反驳的同时,薛定谔也提出“薛定谔的猫”这一佯谬来反对哥本哈根的解释。这一佯谬简单地说是这样的:在一个盒子里,用一个放射性原子的衰变来触发一个装有毒气的瓶子的开关,毒气可以毒死同时放在盒子里的猫。按哥本哈根学派的解释,放射性原子的衰变可以用波函数来描述;当用波函数描述不同状态的组合时(如放射性元素“衰变了”或“没有衰变”这两种状态的组合),我们称之为“波的迭加态”;在没有打开盒子时,放射性原子进入了衰变与不衰变的迭加态,由此猫也成了一只处于迭加态的猫,即又死又活、半死半活、处于地狱边缘的猫。正像哈姆雷特王子所说:“是死,还是活,这可真是一个问题。”只有当你打开盒子的时候,迭加态突然结束(在数学术语就是“坍缩(collapse)”),哈姆雷特王子的犹豫才终于结束:我们知道了猫的确定态:死,或者活。哥本哈根的几率诠释的优点是:只出现一个结果,这与我们观测到的结果相符合。但是有一个大的问题:它要求波函数突然坍缩。但物理学中没有一个公式能够描述这种坍缩。尽管如此,长期以来物理学家们出于实用主义的考虑,还是接受了哥本哈根的诠释。付出的代价是:违反了薛定谔方程。这就难怪薛定谔一直耿耿于怀了。

  哥本哈根诠释在很长的一段时间成了“正统的”、“标准的”诠释。但那只不死不活的猫却总是像恶梦一样让物理学家们不得安宁。格利宾的这本书想告诉我们的是,哥本哈根诠释在哪儿失败,以及用什么诠释可以替代它。

  1957年,埃弗雷特提出的“多世界诠释”似乎为人们带来了福音,虽然由于它太离奇开始没有人认真对待。格利宾认为,多世界诠释有许多优点,由此它可以代替哥本哈根诠释。我们下面简单介绍一下埃弗雷特的多世界诠释。

  行世界。以薛定谔的猫来说,格利宾在书中写道:“埃弗雷特……指出两只猫都是真实的。有一只活猫,有一只死猫,但它们位于不同的世界中。问题并不在于盒子中的放射性原子是否衰变,而在于它既衰变又不衰变。当我们向盒子里看时,整个世界分裂成它自己的两个版本。这两个版本在其余的各个方面都是全同的。唯一的区别在于其中一个版本中,原子衰变了,猫死了;而在另一个版本中,原子没有衰变,猫还活着。”

  也就是说,上面说的“原子衰变了,猫死了;原子没有衰变,猫还活着”这两个世界将完全相互独立地演变下去,就像两个平行的世界一样。格利宾显然十分赞赏这一诠释,所以他接着说:“这听起来就像科幻小说,然而……它是基于无懈可击的数学方程,基于量子力学朴实的、自洽的、符合逻辑的结果。”“在量子的多世界中,我们通过参与而选择出自己的道路。在我们生活的这个世界上,没有隐变量,上帝不会掷骰子,一切都是真实的。”按格利宾所说,爱因斯坦如果还活着,他也许会同意并大大地赞扬这一个“没有隐变量,上帝不会掷骰子”的理论。

  这个诠释的优点是:薛定谔方程始终成立,波函数从不坍缩,由此它简化了基本理论。它的问题是:设想过于离奇,付出的代价是这些平行的世界全都是同样真实的。这就难怪有人说:“在科学史上,多世界诠释无疑是目前所提出的最大胆、最野心勃勃的理论。”

  当然,格利宾也知道,还有许多技术上的难题还等待我们去解决。所以他写道:“我们要么不得不接受哥本哈根的诠释,连同他那幽灵般的现实和半死半活的猫;要么接受埃弗雷特的多世界诠释。当然,可以认为科学市场上的‘最好的家伙’都是不正确的;这两种选择都是错的。关于量子力学的现实,可能还有另一种解释,它既能解决哥本哈根诠释和埃弗雷特的诠释已经解决的所有问题……。但是如果你认为这是一个轻松的选择,一条容易走出困境的路,那么你必须记住任何这种‘新的’解释都必须能够解释自从普朗克在黑暗中取得突破以来的所有成就;在解释万物方面,它必须与目前这两种理论一样好,或者更好。的确,守株待兔似的等待某人会对我们的问题提出一个好的答案,这不是科学的态度。在没有更好的答案情况下,我们就不得不正视目前能得到的最好答案。”

  我们也许记得,在二十世纪二十年代,有一位物理学家声称他有一个理论可以解决量子理论的基本问题时,玻尔说:“你的理论的确美妙,但是还没有美妙到真实的程度。”格利宾现在认为,埃弗雷特的理论“确实已经美妙到真实的程度,在寻找薛定谔的猫方面,这个理论可以给出一个合适的答案”。由此可见格利宾对埃弗雷特的多世界诠释抱有多么大的信心。

http://muyuzi.blogbus.com/logs/2004/04/135915.html

3/10/2006

O Captain! My Captain!


by Walt Whitman

I.

O captain! my captain! our fearful trip is done;
The ship has weathered every rack, the prize we sought is won;
The port is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting,
While follow eyes the stead keel, the vessel grim and daring.

But O heart! heart! heart!
O the bleeding drops of red!
Where on the deck my captain lies,
Fallen cold and dead.

II.

O captain! my captain! rise up and hear the bells;
Rise up! for you the flag is flung, for you the bugle trills:
For you bouquets and ribboned wreaths, for you the shores a-crowding:
For you they call, the swaying mass, their eager faces turning.

O captain! dear father!
This arm beneath your head;
It is some dream that on the deck
You've fallen cold and dead.

III.

My captain does not answer, his lips are pale and still;
My father does not feel my arm, he has no pulse nor will.
The ship is anchored safe and sound, its voyage closed and done:
From fearful trip the victor ship comes in with object won!

Exult, O abores! and ring, O bells!
But I, with silent tread,
Walk the spot my captain lies
Fallen cold and dead.

 

8/31/2005

Comprehensive Test

Comprehensive Test
Harvard has developed this comprehensive Personality test. It was published in the December 1998 issue of the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.
1.When you get up in the morning, what do you usually have for breakfast:
A.Eggs and toast(3)
B.Cereal(1)
C.Pop Tart(6)
D.Nothing(2)
2.If you could have anything you desired, what would you have for breakfast?
A.Eggs and toast(2)
B.Something else(1)
C.Pop Tart(3)
D.Cake(4)
3.It's lunchtime.You:
A.Skip a meal because you are too busy or worried about your weight(2)
B.Get what you have spent all morning thinking about(1)
C.Eat the food you brought with you(3)
D.Find out what your friends are having and tag along(4)
4.A friend offers you some of his/her food.You:
A.Take a bite because you are starving(3)
B.Take a bite to be polite(1)
C.Refuse because you are watching your weight(2)
D.Take 2 bites instead of just one(6)
5.Your future boyfriend/girlfriend offers you something to eat.It is:
A.A cookie(1)
B.An apple(2)
C.A slice of pizza(5)
D.A carrot(3)
6.Your dog is begging you for a treat.You give him:
A.A dog biscuit(3)
B.Some cake(1)
C.Nothing,but you pet him(4)
D.Nothing and you push him away.Treats are bad for him(2)
7.In a dream,you are in the world's best restaurant. You order:
A.Everything on the menu.It's a dream, right?(2)
B.A salad. A big one with everything in it.(1)
C.Steak(3)
D.A rich dessert(4)
8.You are stranded alone on a tropical island.What are the foods you have to have with you?
A.Fruits and vegetables(4)
B.Meat and potatoes(3)
C.Ice cream, chocolate, and cake(2)
D.Chinese food(5)
9.You are an infant and your mother is feeding you:
A.Baby Cereal or formula(6)
B.Broccoli(4)
C.A cookie(8)
D.Nothing, she is doing something else(2)
10.You are 6 years old. Your dad is feeding you:
A.Pizza(7)
B.Spaghetti-Os(5)
C.Bubble gum(1)
D.Carrots (3)
 
Now add up  your scores and find your personality.
 
Your score is 12-20:
You tend to be a shy person. You may feel uncomfortable with a lot of other people. You sometimes think that you were given a body that does not fit your mind, and perhaps you were born in the wrong year. You are much smarter than most people think you are and you do not let other people know about it. You have a giant heart that gets crushed all the time. You tend to have an artistic flair. Music you like:songs about love, lost love, and heartbreak. Your favorite movie:Titanic. There are days when you would rather stay home and deal with annoying people. Cupid has toyed with you. Someone you loved has hurt you. Your parents fought when you were small. You have thought about getting a tattoo.
Your score is 21-30:
You made your way in this world in spite of all the obstacies you have faced. You have seen a lot more troubles than most people. You have had to deal with difficult people, ridiculous rules, and impetuous relationships. Love for you can be as intense as the fire on the face of the sun. You are either very calm on the inside when there is a lot of insanity around you or you shut people up and take charge. You can go to a movie by yourself without the need for someone to go with you. You are as comfortable alone as you are with others. You are angry at your parents and you can't change them. You are a great lover when you find that rare mate who is your equal, but otherwise your relationships have been short or frustrating. You have stayed too long with a partner you did not like. Life is a roller coaster, and you are finding ways to make the good times better. You love sports or have taken drugs.
Your score is 31-42:
You generally are a calm person. You get excited when your favorite band is in town, when you are going on a date with your partner, and when you and your friend are dancing. For you, your friends mean everything to you. You hate it when the summer is over. You like art, and some poetry. You can throw a party, or help a friend put one together. You usually have no trouble finding dates, but you occasionally hit a dry spell. You like the outdoors, usually, and rainy weather doesn't bother you. You sometimes get jealous of people who are smarter or better looking than you, but you wouldn't hold it against them if you got to know them. You are on good terms with your parents, even though they piss you off once in a while. You saw your parents kissing and/or making love once. People tend to think you are reliable and trustworthy. You like animals.
Your score is 43-53:
Sometimes there just isn't enough time in a day for you to do everything you would like to do. If there isn't anything fun going on at the moment, then you know how to get things rolling. You tend to be the kind of person people look up to, and you usually have the ability to excel at most things you try. You usually don't care what people think about you, and you have no problem kissing your mate in public. Sex for you is a passionate art, and you never have a problem in bed, except for being a little too wild for your partner. You tend to have an energy level that is one step above the others, but you can play it cool if you want to. You prefer to play sports than to watch. People have been jealous of you, but it's unlikely you noticed. Your parents are active people, and may not have given you as much time as you wanted. You have a tattoo, play in a band, have blond hair, or are on a sports team. People copy you. Sometimes you are truly miserable, but not for long.
7/20/2005

About Haircut

MEN and women differ a lot from how they look at the story of someone getting a haircut.
Women's version:
Woman2:Oh!You got a haircut!That's so cute!

Woman1:Do you think so?I wasn't sure when she gave me the mirror.I mean,you don't think   it's too fluffy looking?

Woman2:Oh God no!No,it's perfect.I'd love to get my hair cut like that,but I think my face is too wide.I'm pretty much stuck with this stuff I think.
Woman1:Are you serious?I think your face is adorable.And you could easily get one of those special cuts that would look so cute I think. I was actually going to do that except that I was afraid it would accent my long neck.
Woman2:Oh-that's funny!I would love to have your neck!Anything to take attention away from this two-by-four I have for a shoulder line.
Woman1:Are you kidding?I know girls that would love to have your shoulders.Everything appears so well on you.I mean, look at my arms-see how short they are?If I had shoulders I could get clothes to fit me so much easier.
Men's version:
Man2:Haircut?
Man1:Yeah.
7/3/2005

Flight to Las Vegas

Flight to Las Vegas
PASSENGERS were waiting to board the flight to Las Vegas when they announced that the flight was full.The airline was looking for volunteers to give up their seats.
In exchange,they'd give you a $100 voucher for your next flight and a first class seat in the plane leaving an hour later.About eight people ran up to the counter to take advantage of the offer.
It was only about 15 seconds later that all eight of those people sat down grumpily as the lady behind the ticket counter announced,"If there is anyone else OTHER than the flight crew who'd like to volunteer,please step forward..."
 
 
 
 

桢润 张

Occupation